SMG exists because of a belief in the social responsibility to bring about progress for all individuals who suffer from selective mutism. We believe that there is an obligation to foster awareness and understanding so that children, adolescents and adults affected by selective mutism will have access to the help they need to overcome their anxiety and reach their full potential of personal growth and participation in society.Personally I'm not suffering from selective mutism right now, I'm enjoying it--ecstatically embracing the chance to finally communicate at critical moments via typing rather than mouthspeak, knowing that doing so puts me in the middle of a proud and loving disability rights movement. I suspect this organization is doing many great things for my fellow selective mutes, but implying that we "suffer" from our communication needs is not one of them. It seems like it would only encourage (at least some of) us to feel stigmatized/embarrassed/unsafe using accessible communication techniques, which is a
I may be reading too much into this, but I also think there's an implication in the second quoted sentence that selective mutism somehow stops us from "reach[ing] [our] full potential of personal growth and participation in society." For me, I've experienced the opposite--selective mutism has helped propel me to do things like read a personal monologue on stage to an audience of hundreds, ask dozens and dozens of people at a festival if they get consent before sex while tabling for rape prevention, and help NAMI give in-service trainings to teachers on childhood mental illness. Writing on whiteboards to professors in college because mouthspeak failed me was a form of vulnerability that increased our connection and ended up being an excellent accidental networking strategy--I can't say that social anxiety as a whole didn't damage my ability to form relationships during my school years, but selective mutism itself doesn't damage one's ability to make social connections.
You might be reading this and thinking, "What? But being unable to speak by definition keeps you from fully participating socially!"
My answer: "Only if you don't have a keyboard or anything to write with, or the people around you won't accept that form of communication, or you don't think the people around you would accept that form of communication." (Replace "keyboard or anything to write with" with non-mouthspeak communication form of your choice if desired.)
If a shy person can't get a word in edgewise, it's because they're surrounded by people who aren't trying to include them in the conversation. If it's socially unacceptable to communicate one's personal communication needs, it's because the dominant group has issues.
Personally, I think that schools and families should pay attention to whether or not a child is socially isolated, and then figure out how to get that child included. Maybe a more outgoing child who's of the nurturing mindset should be recruited as a mentor, or maybe there's an extracurricular activity the child can be involved in. Nonverbal communication should be explicitly accepted, and the child's opinions solicited. Adults should also be treated with similar consideration.
Decent people do this all the time in social settings. Someone notices that a discussion has been conducted between a few noisy people and walks over to a quiet person to ask them their thoughts. A group wants to go to a bar after a party, but one attendee's under 21, so everyone stops to discuss a mutually satisfactory compromise. Someone really wants to go to a meat-heavy restaurant, but their companion believes in animal rights and would be pale and nauseous just being there, so they go somewhere else instead. Growing up my needs and preferences weren't accommodated in this basic way, which I'm sure contributed greatly to my anxiety--I simply didn't expect a comfortable place to be made for me in society, so every next step was something to be feared.
In turns out I was wrong. I've reached a point in life where my needs are met by the people around me, most of the time, and my feelings and thoughts certainly matter to them. Yes, even (perhaps especially) my boss. Currently I still have some fears, even selective mutism related ones, prominently about whether or not doctors will accept typing as a means of communication. I've usually been damagingly semi-speaking around them, so that I'd answer tersely or tell them what I thought they wanted to hear because I was too anxious to be honest, and they were too dismissive/rushed to relate to me in a way that would help me reach the truth. But if they won't accept typing or otherwise react negatively to it? That's not me suffering from selective mutism. That's me suffering from prejudice.
I'll end on a quote from someone whose words have empowered me more than any therapist: Alyssa of Yes, That Too:
It bothers me when people think of including people as above and beyond because if it's above and beyond, it's not expected. It needs to be expected. Not just for the kid I taught to throw forehand siting down today: his leg will heal. For everyone. Disability is part of the human experience, and the way we live needs to reflect that. People with disabilities need to be able to participate, and the question shouldn't be "Can this person participate?" but "How can this person participate?" - See more at: http://yesthattoo.blogspot.com/2013/06/that-wasnt-being-superstar-no-really.html#sthash.K3CYU8NM.dpuf